← AI Governance & Risk Lead
19 min

Policies, Standards & Controls

Write a short policy, standards under it and controls you can test.

Lesson 3 of 10
0 done
In plain English

A policy says what and why, in two pages. Standards say how. Controls make it real and can be tested. Use preventive, detective and corrective controls together, give each an owner and a test, track written exceptions and review the policy every year.

Policy
A short, stable statement of what we do and why.
Standard
A specific rule for teams, which changes more often.
Exception
A written, approved departure from a rule, with an end date.
Picture it
From promise to proof
Controls
Checks you can test
Standards
How teams do it
Policy
What we do and why

A policy is a promise about how people will behave. A standard says exactly how. A control is the check that proves it. Together they turn good intentions into daily practice. This lesson shows how to write a short AI policy that staff will read, how to build standards under it and how to design controls you can test.

The three layers

  • Policy: short, stable, written for everyone. It says what we do and why.
  • Standards: specific rules for teams, such as how to test or how to handle data. They change more often.
  • Controls: the actual checks and tools that make the standards real, such as a review step or a block on certain data.

A policy people read

Aim for two pages. Use plain words. Answer the questions people really ask.

ai-policy-outline.md
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE      Why we have this; who it covers (staff, contractors, vendors)
2. PRINCIPLES             A few short statements: safe, lawful, fair, transparent, accountable
3. ALLOWED TOOLS          Approved tools; how to ask for a new one
4. DATA RULES             What may go into AI tools; what must never go in
                          (e.g. customer personal data, secrets, regulated data)
5. HUMAN RESPONSIBILITY   People are responsible for AI-assisted work; check before you use it
6. HIGH-RISK USES         Need review before launch (link to the tiers)
7. TRANSPARENCY           When we tell customers or staff that AI is involved
8. REPORTING              How to report a problem or a concern; no blame for good-faith reports
9. ROLES                  Who owns the policy; who approves exceptions
10. REVIEW                How often the policy is updated

Standards under the policy

  • Data handling: which data classes may go to which tools and regions.
  • Testing: what evidence each tier needs before launch.
  • Human oversight: when a person must approve, and how to make that review real.
  • Documentation: what must be written down about each system.
  • Monitoring: what is watched after launch, and how often.
  • Procurement: questions every AI vendor must answer.
  • Incident handling: how to report and respond.

Design controls that can be tested

A control is good if you can show it works. Write each control with an owner, a frequency and a way to test it.

control-record.md
CONTROL: No customer personal data in unapproved AI tools
TYPE: Preventive (blocks)   |   Detective (finds)   |   Corrective (fixes)
OWNER: IT security
HOW IT WORKS: The network gateway blocks unapproved AI sites; approved tools sit behind login
              with data-loss rules for personal data patterns
FREQUENCY: Continuous
HOW WE TEST IT: Each quarter, try five blocked actions and review the gateway logs
EVIDENCE: Test report, log extract, list of approved tools
LAST TESTED: {{date}}     RESULT: {{pass / fail / action}}

Prevent, detect, correct

  • Preventive controls stop a problem: blocks, approvals, permissions.
  • Detective controls find a problem: logs, alerts, audits, sampling.
  • Corrective controls fix a problem: rollback, retraining, incident plans.

A good design uses all three. Prevention alone fails sometimes. Detection alone comes too late.

Exceptions

Sometimes a team needs to step outside the rules. Allow it with a written exception: who asked, why, what risk, what extra controls, who approved and when it ends. Track them. A pile of old exceptions means the standard is wrong.

Keep it short and current

  • Review the policy at least once a year, and when laws or tools change.
  • Retire rules nobody follows. Unused rules weaken the rest.
  • Publish it where people look, and show examples of allowed and not allowed uses.
  • Measure: do people know the policy? Ask three questions in a survey.
⚠Do not copy another company's policy word for word. It will not match your tools, data or risk. Use it for ideas, then write your own.
Key takeaways
  • ✓Policy says what and why in two pages. Standards say how. Controls make it real and can be tested.
  • ✓Cover tools, data rules, human responsibility, high-risk uses, transparency, reporting, roles and review.
  • ✓Write each control with an owner, frequency, test and evidence. Use preventive, detective and corrective controls together.
  • ✓Track written exceptions, review the policy yearly and measure whether people know it.
Hands-on exercise

Draft a policy and one control

  1. Write a one-page AI policy using the outline, in plain words.
  2. Pick the rule about data in AI tools. Write one preventive, one detective and one corrective control for it.
  3. Fill in the control record for the preventive control, including how you would test it.
  4. Write an exception form with six fields.
Check yourself
Q1What is the difference between a policy and a standard?show answer

A policy is short and stable and says what we do and why. A standard gives specific rules for teams and changes more often.

Q2Why must a control be testable?show answer

If you cannot show it works, you cannot prove it to an auditor or trust it yourself. Each control needs an owner, a test and evidence.

Q3What does a pile of old exceptions suggest?show answer

The standard may be wrong or unrealistic. Review it instead of letting exceptions grow.

← AI Inventory & Risk ClassificationLaws & Frameworks: A Working Map →
0 / 10 finished0%